Research &
Communications, Inc
Maryland Poll
February 2001
Contact: Carol Arscott
410-461-5744
Methodology
Patrick E. Gonzales and
Carol A. Arscott, the former president and vice president of Mason-Dixon
Campaign Polling & Strategy, Inc., formed Gonzales Research & Marketing Strategies, Inc. at the beginning of 1999.
Gonzales is a 1981 graduate
of the University of Baltimore with deep roots in the Anne Arundel County
Democratic Party who served as a principal advisor to Janet Owens’ 1998
campaign for County Executive. Arscott
is a 1977 graduate of the Georgetown University School of Foreign Service and a
former chairman of the Howard County Republican Party.
Gonzales and Arscott
together have over 30 years of professional experience in politics. They have served as pollsters and
consultants to dozens of political clients in Maryland since the mid-1980s,
including County Executives Janet Owens, Doug Duncan, Jim Harkins, Chuck Ecker,
Eileen Rehrmann, and Robert Neall; and State Senators Tom Bromwell, Marty
Madden, John Astle, Chris McCabe, and Jean Roesser.
This survey was conducted by
Gonzales Research & Marketing Strategies, Inc. from February 20th
through February 23rd, 2001.
A total of 511 registered voters in Maryland were interviewed by
telephone. All stated they vote
regularly in statewide general elections.
A cross-section of calls was made into each jurisdiction within the state
to reflect general election voting patterns.
The margin for error,
according to customary statistical standards, is no more than plus or minus 4.5
percentage points. This means that
there is a 95 percent probability that the “true” figures would fall within
this range if the entire survey universe were sampled. The margin for error is higher for any
demographic subgroup, such as gender, or race.
Ó This
survey is provided free of charge.
However, we ask that Gonzales Research & Marketing Strategies,
Inc. of Annapolis be credited if the survey is cited in a news story or column.
Maryland Statewide Poll Sample Demographics
|
Gender Male 254 (50%) Female 257 (50%) |
|
Party Democrat 297 (58%) Republican 164 (32%) Independent 50 (10%) |
|
Race White 389 (76%) Black 118 (23%) Other 4 |
|
Region Eastern Shore/So. MD 62 (12%) Baltimore City 51 (10%) Baltimore Suburbs 183 (36%) Washington Suburbs 158 (31%) Western MD 57 (11%) |
Regional
Groupings
Eastern Shore/Southern Maryland - includes voters in these counties: Calvert, Caroline, Cecil, Charles, Dorchester, Kent, Queen Anne’s, St. Mary’s, Somerset, Talbot, Wicomico, and Worcester.
Baltimore City - includes voters in the City of Baltimore.
Baltimore Suburbs - includes voters in these counties: Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Harford, and Howard.
Washington Suburbs - includes voters in these counties: Montgomery, and Prince George’s.
Western Maryland - includes voters in these counties: Allegany, Carroll, Frederick, Garrett, and Washington.
President
George W. Bush lost Maryland by 17 percentage points in the 2000 general
election. So, how’s he doing with Free
State voters one month since his inauguration?
The answer: Not bad, considering
where he started. Forty-seven percent
of Maryland voters surveyed said they approve of the job George W. Bush is
doing as president while 34% said they disapprove. The remaining 19% gave no answer.
Whites
approve of Bush’s on-the-job performance by a ratio of nearly two-to-one (54%
to 29%), while African-Americans said they disapprove of his performance in
office by the same ratio (51% to 24%).
Men
said they approve of Bush’s job performance as President by a similar
two-to-one ratio (53% to 28%), while women are nearly equally divided (41% to
40%). This, again, is an improvement
for Bush, who was losing women 2-to-1 in our final survey before the November
election.
Maryland’s
Republicans are, not surprisingly, downright giddy about their new president,
with 75% approving of his performance in office, compared with 12% who
disapproved (our last poll had Gore getting 18% of the GOP vote in Maryland). Democrats disapprove, 33% to 46%. Independents were evenly split at 37% in
that final poll, and remain closely divided, with 38% approving of Bush’s job
performance and 34% disapproving.
Saving
Social Security always topped the charts no matter what the candidates were
discussing, and no matter what the media was covering, during the fall election
campaign. It is no surprise, then,
that saving Social Security remains the Number One concern of Maryland voters,
24% of whom named that issue as most important in response to an open-ended
question asking for “the most important issue facing the President and Congress
today.”
The
number of voters citing education nearly doubled, from 12% in late October to 22%
today, vaulting it to the Number Two position from fourth place in the
fall. The economy came in at 17%,
holding a steady percentage of the voters since the fall (18% in October). Tax cuts places fourth, cited by 10% of
voters as the most important issue in Washington (9% in October). Health care and prescription drugs, cited by
16% in October – good enough for a third place finish during the campaign
season – was cited by just 6% in the February survey.
Foreign
policy and defense issues (5%), bipartisanship and civility (3%), energy policy
and prices (3%), and election reform (1%) rounded out the survey. The remaining 9% offered no answer.
Survey
respondents were asked a series of questions about the tax cut proposal
outlined by President Bush earlier this month, first taking the major
components individually, and then putting them together in the package that the
President has advanced, and identifying it as his.
In
the first question, Maryland voters were told that “under current law, the
wages of American workers are taxed at five different rates, ranging from 15%
for lower incomes workers to 39.6% for higher income workers.” Respondents were then asked if they would
“favor or oppose an across-the-board federal income tax rate cut for taxpayers
at all levels.” Fifty-two percent of
Maryland voters said they favored an across-the-board rate cut, while 25% said
they would oppose it. The remaining 23%
gave no answer.
Whites
favored a tax rate cut 59% to 20%, while blacks opposed it 42% to 29%. Men (60%) were far more likely to support a
rate cut than women (44%), though a plurality of women did support a tax rate
cut as well (44% to 31%). Democrats
were evenly split, 35% in favor, 35% opposed, and 30% giving no answer. Republicans clearly favor the tax rate cut
(86% to 6%), and independents back it by close to a two-to-one ratio (44% to
26%).
The
second tax question explained that “some time ago, the Congress established a
federal estate tax designed to prevent the accumulation of wealth in families
passed from one generation to the next,” and that “[e]states of deceased
persons are currently taxed on a sliding scale starting at 37% on amounts about
$675,000.” Just 28% of Maryland voters
said they favor “the elimination of federal estate taxes” while a clear
majority, 58%, are opposed. The
remaining 14% offered no answer.
Elimination of the federal estate tax is even a loser with Maryland
Republicans, favored by only 39% and opposed by 45%.
In
the third tax question, survey respondents were told that “the federal
government taxes two-earner married couples at a higher rate than two single
people earning identical wages,” and that “[t]his is sometimes called the
marriage penalty.” An overwhelming
majority of Marylanders, 65%, said they would favor “the elimination of the
marriage penalty,” while just 14% are opposed.
The remaining 21% gave no answer.
The
major components of the plan were then pulled together in a single question
which read as follows: “As you may
know, President Bush has proposed a 10-year, 1.6 trillion dollar tax cut
package that includes a rate cut for all taxpayers, with new tax rates ranging
from a low of 10% to a high of 33%; a doubling of the per-child tax credit to
$1000; a reduction of the marriage penalty; and elimination of the federal
estate tax in 2009. It would also
permit taxpayers who do not itemize to deduct charitable contributions.”
When
asked whether they favored or opposed the tax cut package, 49% of Maryland
voters said they backed Bush’s plan, 36% opposed it, and the remaining 15% gave
no answer. The overall plan is backed
strongly by Republicans (84% to 7%), and in majority fashion by whites (56% to
32%) and men (55% to 31%). Women (43%
to 41%) and independents (36% to 34%) support the plan narrowly. Bush’s tax cut package is opposed by
African-Americans (50% to 26%) and by Democrats (52% to 32%).
The
next series of questions probe voter sentiment about the much-maligned and
suddenly relevant electoral college in the wake of the controversial 2000
presidential election.
The
first of three questions featured a straight explanation of the current system
and asked whether voters in Maryland favored or opposed it: “As you may know, presidential election are
decided based on the electoral college, a system where each state has a number
of votes equal to the number of congressional districts in that state, plus two
‘bonus’ votes for each state. All but
two states operate under a ‘winner-take-all’ system, where all of a state’s
electoral votes are awarded to the candidate who wins the popular vote in that
state.” The current system wins the
favor of 57% of Marylanders, while 18% said they oppose the electoral college,
and the remaining 25% gave no answer.
Republicans (67%) were more likely to support the status quo, but the
differences among the remaining demographic subgroups were insignificant.
The
electoral vote apportioning system employed by the states of Nebraska and Maine
was described to respondents in the second question in this section, where
“[t]he winner of the popular vote in each of congressional district wins one
vote, and the overall winner of the state is awarded the state’s two ‘bonus’
votes.” When asked whether they would
“favor or oppose this applying this system nationally,” 46% said they favored
such a change while 16% opposed it, and the remaining 38% offered no
answer. Among the survey’s demographic
subgroups, the percentage opposed to an apportioning system was virtually
unchanged, with just a three-point range, from 14% to 17%. The percentage favoring the modified system
was identical for men and women at 46%, but varied according to party
affiliation: 41% for Democrats, 54% for
Republicans, and 48% for independents.
However,
when told how the application of this modified system to Maryland would have
affected the distribution of the electoral vote, sentiment changed
considerably. When informed that Al
Gore would have been awarded seven electoral votes and Bush would have been
awarded three -- whereas Gore had won all ten votes under the current system --
just 33% favored the modified model while 55% opposed it. The remaining 12% gave no answer. Republicans were enthusiastic about the
possibilities, favoring a Maine/Nebraska system 70% to 15%, but Democrats were
even more adamantly opposed (76% to 13%).
A
Democratic primary contest between former Vice President Al Gore and New York
Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton would result in a 2:1 victory for Gore if the
election were held today. Forty-three
percent of Democrats surveyed said they would back Gore, while 22% would choose
Clinton, and 35% were undecided.
When
the field was expanded to include “some other candidate,” Clinton’s numbers
remained virtually static (21%) while Gore’s slipped to 38%. “Some other candidate” earned 11% of the
votes of Maryland’s Democrats, while 30% were undecided – not an entirely
unreasonable sentiment.
National
Issues
QUESTION: Do you approve or disapprove of the job George W. Bush is doing as president?
|
|
Approve |
Disapprove |
No answer |
|
Statewide
|
47% |
34% |
19% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
54% |
29% |
17% |
|
|
24% |
51% |
25% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53% |
28% |
19% |
|
|
Women |
41% |
40% |
19% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Democrat |
33% |
46% |
21% |
|
Republican |
75% |
12% |
13% |
|
Independent |
38% |
34% |
28% |
QUESTION: In your opinion, what is the most important issue facing the President and Congress today?
Social Security/Medicare 24%
Education 22%
Tax cuts 10%
Health care/prescription drugs 6%
Foreign Policy/National defense 5%
Bipartisanship/Civility/New tone in
DC 3%
Energy Prices/Policy 3%
Election reform 1%
No answer 9%
QUESTION: Under current law, the wages of American workers are taxed at five different rates ranging from 15% for lower income workers to 39.6% for higher income workers. Do you favor or oppose an across-the-board federal income tax rate cut for taxpayers at all levels?
|
|
Favor |
Oppose |
No answer |
|
Statewide
|
52% |
25% |
23% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
59% |
20% |
21% |
|
|
29% |
42% |
29% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60% |
19% |
21% |
|
|
Women |
44% |
31% |
25% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Democrat |
35% |
35% |
30% |
|
Republican |
86% |
6% |
8% |
|
Independent |
44% |
26% |
30% |
QUESTION: Some time ago, the Congress established a federal estate tax designed to prevent the accumulation of wealth in families passed from one generation to the next. Estates of deceased persons are currently taxed on a sliding scale starting at 37% on amounts above $675,000. Do you favor or oppose the elimination of federal estate taxes?
|
|
Favor |
Oppose |
No answer |
|
Statewide
|
28% |
58% |
14% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32% |
55% |
13% |
|
|
14% |
69% |
17% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31% |
56% |
13% |
|
|
Women |
25% |
60% |
15% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Democrat |
22% |
65% |
13% |
|
Republican |
39% |
45% |
16% |
|
Independent |
28% |
60% |
12% |
QUESTION: As you may know, the federal government taxes two-earner married couples at a higher rate than two single people earning identical wages. This is sometimes called the marriage penalty. Do you favor or oppose the elimination of the marriage penalty?
|
|
Favor |
Oppose |
No answer |
|
Statewide
|
65% |
14% |
21% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
67% |
13% |
20% |
|
|
59% |
17% |
24% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66% |
15% |
19% |
|
|
Women |
64% |
13% |
23% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Democrat |
63% |
16% |
21% |
|
Republican |
71% |
10% |
19% |
|
Independent |
62% |
14% |
24% |
QUESTION: As you may know, President Bush has proposed a 10-year, 1.6 trillion dollar tax cut package that includes a rate cut for all taxpayers, with new tax rates ranging from a low of 10% to a high of 33%; a doubling of the per-child tax credit to $1000; a reduction of the marriage penalty; and elimination of the federal estate tax in 2009. It would also permit taxpayers who do not itemize to deduct charitable contributions. Do you favor or oppose this tax cut package?
|
|
Favor |
Oppose |
No answer |
|
Statewide
|
49% |
36% |
15% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
56% |
32% |
14% |
|
|
26% |
50% |
16% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55% |
31% |
12% |
|
|
Women |
43% |
41% |
24% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Democrat |
32% |
52% |
16% |
|
Republican |
84% |
7% |
9% |
|
Independent |
36% |
34% |
30% |
QUESTION: As you may know, presidential elections are decided based on the electoral college, a system where each state has a number of votes equal to the number of congressional districts in that state, plus two “bonus” votes for each state. All but two states operate under a “winner-take-all” system, where all of a state’s electoral votes are awarded to the candidate who wins the popular vote in that state. Do you favor or oppose the electoral college system?
|
|
Favor |
Oppose |
No answer |
|
Statewide
|
57% |
18% |
25% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
56% |
20% |
24% |
|
|
Women |
58% |
16% |
26% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Democrat |
52% |
21% |
27% |
|
Republican |
67% |
13% |
20% |
|
Independent |
56% |
16% |
28% |
QUESTION: As you may know, two states – Nebraska and Maine – apportion their states’ electoral votes by congressional district. The winner of the popular vote in each congressional district wins one vote, and the overall winner of the state is awarded the states’ two “bonus” votes. Would you favor or oppose applying this system nationally?
|
|
Favor |
Oppose |
No answer |
|
Statewide
|
46% |
16% |
38% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46% |
17% |
37% |
|
|
Women |
46% |
15% |
39% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Democrat |
41% |
17% |
42% |
|
Republican |
54% |
15% |
31% |
|
Independent |
48% |
14% |
38% |
QUESTION: Under the current electoral college system, all ten of Maryland’s electoral votes were won by Al Gore. Under the modified electoral college system described above, Maryland’s 10 electoral votes would have been distributed differently. George W. Bush won the popular vote in three congressional districts, while Al Gore won the popular vote in five. Therefore, Bush would have been awarded three electoral votes, while Gore would have been awarded seven, the five from the congressional districts he won, and the two “bonus” votes. Would you favor or oppose applying a modified electoral college system in Maryland?
|
|
Favor |
Oppose |
No answer |
|
Statewide
|
33% |
55% |
12% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38% |
49% |
13% |
|
|
Women |
28% |
61% |
11% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Democrat |
13% |
76% |
11% |
|
Republican |
70% |
15% |
15% |
|
Independent |
32% |
56% |
12% |
QUESTION: If the 2004 Democratic primary for president were held today, for whom would you vote if the candidates were Hillary Rodham Clinton and Al Gore?
|
|
Gore |
Clinton |
Undecided |
|
Statewide
|
43% |
22% |
35% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
49% |
16% |
35% |
|
|
Women |
37% |
27% |
36% |
QUESTION: If the 2004 Democratic primary for president were hold today, would you cast your vote for Hillary Rodham Clinton, for Al Gore, or for some other candidate?
|
|
Gore |
Clinton |
Someone Else |
Undecided |
|
Statewide
|
38% |
21% |
11% |
30% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43% |
15% |
11% |
31% |
|
|
Women |
33% |
26% |
11% |
30% |